Plato said formula is prompted by concern in the past , " a democratic
society may fall within the framework of his thirst for freedom, under
the influence of bad leaders."
Greek philosopher was also feared that the "smiling People pay tribute
to the man who tells people what they want to hear more than you can
really benefit them."
In fact, these concerns appear to be more visible and closely Boaamna
This, at a time when a quarter to a third of voters shows that they are
ready to provide support to candidates who come from outside the
mainstream. In fact, the acceptance enjoyed by the candidate such as Donald Trump, but on foreign stature.
It is not a problem largely confined to the candidates such have new ideas, but they are simple to some risk.
In a related context, the journalist DHL Mencken said that "for every
complex problem, said there is a simple and wrong solution is clear."
The idea may be the adoption of a wall on the US southern border (or
even North); and may be gathering 120 billion pounds in tax returns form
of "missing"; perhaps, is "a better deal" with Iran over inspections of
nuclear arms; what could Greece refuses to be austerity while
continuing to stay in the euro zone.
When politicians respond to the mainstream of these ideas, they have to
provide answers to complex can not be viewed simply in the headnotes
(Well, maybe not revolve around the idea of building a wall foolish
mainly).
In fact, a complex modern societies are considered incredibly. If there were simple answers to political problems, they would have found and implemented before.
When governments take the idea of raising taxes into account, it
should be focused on collection costs and the impact on economic
activity, and the possibility of moving taxpayers to other areas; and
has taken into account the spending cuts, you will be faced with the
problem that a lot of spending automated in fact (such as pensions
pensions and unemployment benefits) as well as the impact of the move on
the economy.
This is a complex decisions in a matter of fact; economies do not agree
on the relative impact of raising taxes versus spending cuts, the
impact of the financial size of the multiplier on the economy, in
addition to the relative importance of the financial return for monetary
policy and many other issues. For those who think that they have easy answers, they might not be have given the issue the appropriate amount of thinking.
When governments agree to international transactions, you will not get
them as you like, of course, Providing concessions are inevitable.
Once that says she "got the best deal" will not ignore the restrictions
only, but the political consequences in the event no agreement was
reached. "
Those
who support a deal exposed to criticism as weak; but contrary thesis
(what would happen if no agreement is reached) can not be arranged to
provide a rational versus.
Western policy seem chaotic in the Middle East, but must take each
person Bzn it has the correct date to answer as; the occupation of Iraq
failed, and the failure of the military intervention in Libya affairs,
too, and had to follow the non-interference in Syria's policy alarming
results. And those who will remain Ieibon it unnecessarily always able to claim the results of his likeness in their world fantasy.
The journalists, of course, guilty as anyone else in this matter, it is
easy for them to raise their assessments of others to higher levels.
But they can Ivnbwa in another way as well; over-treated politics as a
game in which one party wins or loses, and where the lack of agreement
between the parties, "a split and split."